From 6d7ba58f880be618ade07f8ea080fe8c4bf8a896 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: cyfraeviolae Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2024 03:10:44 -0400 Subject: venv --- .../greenlet/greenlet_compiler_compat.hpp | 95 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 95 insertions(+) create mode 100644 venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/greenlet/greenlet_compiler_compat.hpp (limited to 'venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/greenlet/greenlet_compiler_compat.hpp') diff --git a/venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/greenlet/greenlet_compiler_compat.hpp b/venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/greenlet/greenlet_compiler_compat.hpp new file mode 100644 index 0000000..ee5bbdd --- /dev/null +++ b/venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/greenlet/greenlet_compiler_compat.hpp @@ -0,0 +1,95 @@ +/* -*- indent-tabs-mode: nil; tab-width: 4; -*- */ +#ifndef GREENLET_COMPILER_COMPAT_HPP +#define GREENLET_COMPILER_COMPAT_HPP + +/** + * Definitions to aid with compatibility with different compilers. + * + * .. caution:: Use extreme care with noexcept. + * Some compilers and runtimes, specifically gcc/libgcc/libstdc++ on + * Linux, implement stack unwinding by throwing an uncatchable + * exception, one that specifically does not appear to be an active + * exception to the rest of the runtime. If this happens while we're in a noexcept function, + * we have violated our dynamic exception contract, and so the runtime + * will call std::terminate(), which kills the process with the + * unhelpful message "terminate called without an active exception". + * + * This has happened in this scenario: A background thread is running + * a greenlet that has made a native call and released the GIL. + * Meanwhile, the main thread finishes and starts shutting down the + * interpreter. When the background thread is scheduled again and + * attempts to obtain the GIL, it notices that the interpreter is + * exiting and calls ``pthread_exit()``. This in turn starts to unwind + * the stack by throwing that exception. But we had the ``PyCall`` + * functions annotated as noexcept, so the runtime terminated us. + * + * #2 0x00007fab26fec2b7 in std::terminate() () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6 + * #3 0x00007fab26febb3c in __gxx_personality_v0 () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6 + * #4 0x00007fab26f34de6 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1 + * #6 0x00007fab276a34c6 in __GI___pthread_unwind at ./nptl/unwind.c:130 + * #7 0x00007fab2769bd3a in __do_cancel () at ../sysdeps/nptl/pthreadP.h:280 + * #8 __GI___pthread_exit (value=value@entry=0x0) at ./nptl/pthread_exit.c:36 + * #9 0x000000000052e567 in PyThread_exit_thread () at ../Python/thread_pthread.h:370 + * #10 0x00000000004d60b5 in take_gil at ../Python/ceval_gil.h:224 + * #11 0x00000000004d65f9 in PyEval_RestoreThread at ../Python/ceval.c:467 + * #12 0x000000000060cce3 in setipaddr at ../Modules/socketmodule.c:1203 + * #13 0x00000000006101cd in socket_gethostbyname + */ + +#include + +# if defined(__clang__) +# define G_FP_TMPL_STATIC static +# else +// GCC has no problem allowing static function pointers, but emits +// tons of warnings about "whose type uses the anonymous namespace [-Wsubobject-linkage]" +# define G_FP_TMPL_STATIC +# endif + +# define G_NO_COPIES_OF_CLS(Cls) private: \ + Cls(const Cls& other) = delete; \ + Cls& operator=(const Cls& other) = delete + +# define G_NO_ASSIGNMENT_OF_CLS(Cls) private: \ + Cls& operator=(const Cls& other) = delete + +# define G_NO_COPY_CONSTRUCTOR_OF_CLS(Cls) private: \ + Cls(const Cls& other) = delete; + + +// CAUTION: MSVC is stupidly picky: +// +// "The compiler ignores, without warning, any __declspec keywords +// placed after * or & and in front of the variable identifier in a +// declaration." +// (https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/cpp/declspec?view=msvc-160) +// +// So pointer return types must be handled differently (because of the +// trailing *), or you get inscrutable compiler warnings like "error +// C2059: syntax error: ''" +// +// In C++ 11, there is a standard syntax for attributes, and +// GCC defines an attribute to use with this: [[gnu:noinline]]. +// In the future, this is expected to become standard. + +#if defined(__GNUC__) || defined(__clang__) +/* We used to check for GCC 4+ or 3.4+, but those compilers are + laughably out of date. Just assume they support it. */ +# define GREENLET_NOINLINE(name) __attribute__((noinline)) name +# define GREENLET_NOINLINE_P(rtype, name) rtype __attribute__((noinline)) name +# define UNUSED(x) UNUSED_ ## x __attribute__((__unused__)) +#elif defined(_MSC_VER) +/* We used to check for && (_MSC_VER >= 1300) but that's also out of date. */ +# define GREENLET_NOINLINE(name) __declspec(noinline) name +# define GREENLET_NOINLINE_P(rtype, name) __declspec(noinline) rtype name +# define UNUSED(x) UNUSED_ ## x +#endif + +#if defined(_MSC_VER) +# define G_NOEXCEPT_WIN32 noexcept +#else +# define G_NOEXCEPT_WIN32 +#endif + + +#endif -- cgit v1.2.3