# The Return of Martin Guerre ## Natalie Zemon Davis - "Clandestine marriage" - Marriage in canon law defined by consent of partners and their consent alone - ven w/o priests or witnesses present - Church disapproved but still technically allowed - Can allow one to think of marriage as something in their (Bertrande & Arnaud) hands to create, rather than an external structure imposed upon them by parents/society/priest - However under Catholicism still adulterers / would be excommunicated immediately - Hope from protestantism - They could tell story/be answerable to god alone and not families/community - Marriage no longer a sacrament, divorce/remarriage more permissable - Also a sort of "rebirth" or "conversion" for previously-vice-ridden Arnaud - Self-fashioning vs lying - Self-fashioning - molding speech, manners, gestures, conversation to help advance socially - When did self-fashioning stop and lying begin? - Bertrande also self-fashions - Written about by de Montaigne - maybe Of cripples? - Judge in Toulouse - Jean de Coras - highly educated, prodigy of law, very in love with wife - Account of trial - "Arrest Memorable" - Depiction of trial + Annotation - Tendency to favor keeping marriages/families together when in doubt (law - societal stability over truth?) - e.g., did not press Bertrande too hard even though her testimony was very suspicious, court believes that she was tricked - 1557 treatise on clandestine marriages - against them completely, unlike Catholic church - Protestant view - marriage requiring not priest, but approval of *parents* (as proxy for God) - sudden return of martin guerre seemed like a protestant-y act of providence/god's grace - when all the bureaucracy of the courts have failed (and the judicial system being derived from canon law courts of catholicism/vatican) - in the end we are still fallible, can only rely on providence - Larger protestant argument, maybe - Under protestantism - Marriage of children wouldn't happen - Bertrande would be given divorce much more readily in absence of husband - And would have quickly discovered adultery? (how?) - Though a legal text, Arrest Memorable calls into question the power of law to ascertain truth and dispense justice - Still shows some doubts Coras had about the case, almost giving Arnaud some credit - Text (with less than dispassionate commentary) exaggerates Arnaud's memory, makes Bertrande more innocent, adds more crimes to Arnaud - Emphasize text as a moral story, but with a strangely heroic villain - No hero at all - Martin not portrayed in great light, nor any indication that marriage will be happy - First edition doesn't even include confession, but was added later - Michel de Montaigne "Of the Lame" essay (of cripples) - About why witches should not be burned - References Martin Guerre, not just superficially - difficulty of knowing truth and how uncertain human reason is - "Truth and falsehood have both alike countenances....we beholde them with one same eye" - Considers that by Coras' account, not enough evidence to make a judgment (maybe only read first version without confession) - Especially for death penalty, needs luminous, sharp clarity of evidence - Rebukes Coras for decision, however, Coras himself kept a lot of ambiguity in Arrest Memorable - Finally, a question for historians/history books like this one - what is truth, and how can we be sure?